Page 1 of 1

New England Journal of Medicin - Mental GI

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:15 am
by lorg
NEJM Combat Duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mental Health Problems, and Barriers to Care

Apparently nearly as many as 1/6 of the GI's coming home from Iraq are suffering from some sort of mental disorder according to the New England Journal of Medicin. The number is larger then the once that has served in Afghanistan, larger then after the first Gulf War and larger then Vietnam (not sure if that is just % wise or actuall persons).

Most of them appear to suffer from some form of depression, anxiety or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
NEJM wrote:Conclusions This study provides an initial look at the mental health of members of the Army and the Marine Corps who were involved in combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Our findings indicate that among the study groups there was a significant risk of mental health problems and that the subjects reported important barriers to receiving mental health services, particularly the perception of stigma among those most in need of such care.

Makes me wonder if we'll see a new form of gulf-war syndrome to.

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 11:43 am
by Eva
Could it not be that either mental health professionals are more perceptive to possible problems soldiers may be suffering, or that the soldiers themselves are.. well, you know.. sissy bitches compared to those who went to war 30 years ago?

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 11:45 am
by 3278
I would find both extraordinarily likely.

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 2:25 pm
by Daki
And, in my opinion, I think many mental health professionals want to err on the side of caution and over-diagnose a problem. These men and women are coming back from a war zone where targets are being hit almost daily by bomb squads. Many have also been there on extended tours and will need time to re-adjust to home-life. Living on constant edge and then being home is a harsh high to come down from.

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 3:36 pm
by lordhellion
Keep America over-diagnosed and drugged up! Yeah!

Posted: Fri Jul 02, 2004 3:44 pm
by Daki
lordhellion wrote:Keep America over-diagnosed and drugged up! Yeah!
Considering the utter lack of support for soliders coming back from Vietnam, it's understandable why they are going to the opposite extreme.

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 1:58 am
by lordhellion

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 2:19 am
by Marius
Psychiatric Drugs--Not Just for Vets Anymore
A mental health initiative. Good.

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 4:00 am
by Nightsky
You have to really watch what the shrinks say. If you took the entire population to a shrink 95% of them would be diagnosed with ADD.

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 4:02 am
by Marius
What an ignorant thing to suggest.

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 4:10 am
by Szechuan
Agreed.

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 5:40 am
by Kwyndig
Marius wrote:
Psychiatric Drugs--Not Just for Vets Anymore
A mental health initiative. Good.
Mental health, fine, TMAP, not so good. I don't like lining the pockets of pharmaceutical companies so wage drone A can live a slightly better life now that his mild depression is cleared up with new drugs, especially when A would have been just fine if we tackled why wage drone A was depressed/ADD/etc instead of just treating it. Now, serious mental illness, I have no issue with, honestly I need to have my head meats checked out again one of these days, but America should not be using prescription drugs to feel better, IMO, anyway.

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 6:06 am
by Marius
Your objection is immaterial. So far the initiative is for increased screening and more evidence basis to treatment. Nothing so far gives reason to suggest that anyone improperly profits or that there is any tendency to over-medicate. Grassy knoll speculation and Pharma boogeymen do not good policy make.

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 10:37 am
by Serious Paul
Niether does blind faith. Care to shine a little light on what makes you so sure?

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 5:23 pm
by 3278
And I don't think anyone would disagree that America is over-medicated and over-diagnosed with psychological problems, ADD included. While Nightsky's comment is hyperbole, the reality of what is being suggested seems, to me, to be true.

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 5:49 pm
by Nightsky
This reminds me of the ADD craze a few years ago with school kids where ritalin was handed out to elementary students like candy. A few had bad reactions to the drug and many had their personalities so heavily altered (they became droozy, lethargic) that their parents thought they were sick. Now I believe they are altering the style of teaching to classrooms and, the fact of the matter is, most kids that age have attention spans measured in commercial breaks.

Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 10:54 pm
by Chopper
There is a drug that reverses the effects of ritalin in case of overdiagnosis. It is called ritalout. (South Park rip-off)

There also happons to be a punk band called Riddlin Kids. http://www.riddlinkids.com/

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 8:23 am
by Marius
Funny thing is that there probably wasn't an overdiagnosisi of ritalin for ADD. The Surgeon General's Report on Mental Health found that ADD was actually underdiagnosed. That it existed in more of the population than was actually diagnosed with it, but still that many people being treated for it shoudn't have been. The misdiagnosis, according to the Surgeon General's office was the reliance on the judgement of people not properly trained to make diagnoses, like school psychologists, and teachers, or Cain. [Obligatory cheap shot.]

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 12:57 pm
by Bishop
:lol

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 2:33 pm
by Chopper
The Surgeon General can also misdiagnose a situation, influenced by medical opinions collected from ALOT of doctors. Take it with a grain of salt.

Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2004 3:45 pm
by Moto42
I have ADD, slightly more severe than most, but not to bad.
I was on ritalin and/or dexidrine for at least 3 years (they switched me from one to the other after a while), probably longer but my memory refuses to go back that far right now.
When my grades continued to fall, despite the effects of the drugs (which did help me concentrate) they just upped the dosage rather than think it might be caused by a different problem. Looking back on it, I can tell you at a glance that is was depression, thank god they didn't realise that though, some of those anti-depressents are bad news.

The "overdiagnosed and drugged up" idea blows it out of proportion, but there is a problem of medical proffessionals going into brainlock over one thing or another and not considering that something else may be the real problem.

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 3:33 am
by Marius
The Surgeon General can also misdiagnose a situation, influenced by medical opinions collected from ALOT of doctors. Take it with a grain of salt.
Well yeah, of course. What do doctors know about health?

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 7:52 am
by Cain
The misdiagnosis, according to the Surgeon General's office was the reliance on the judgement of people not properly trained to make diagnoses, like school psychologists, and teachers, or Cain.
:D

Truth to tell, I've never actually ever diagnosed a case of ADD. I have correctly diagnosed more than a few cases of "Bad Parent Breath", but no ADD. IIRC, it's MD's and teachers who misdiagnose ADD. A pure MD shouldn't be diagnosing Major Depression or ADD; that is really the job of a psychiatrist. (And yes, that applies to teachers and mere psychologists. With the new drug treatments out there, people should really be seeing the psychopharmacology experts-- namely, psychiatrists.)

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 10:48 am
by Paul
So the surgeon general is immune to political pressure? Sweet.

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 4:38 pm
by Szechuan
Paul wrote:So the surgeon general is immune to political pressure? Sweet.
No. It's just Bludgeoning/15, but it helps.

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 8:58 pm
by FlakJacket
Marius wrote:Well yeah, of course. What do doctors know about health?
Well just look at how many peopke die in hospitals or under medical care. Certainly suggestive of something. ;)

Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2004 11:16 pm
by Marius
Well just look at how many peopke die in hospitals or under medical care. Certainly suggestive of something.
Oh, pshaw. You're only drinking too much if your mistake rate exceeds one death per drink.