Cheating on exams/papers
Cheating on exams/papers
It isn't really an accepted practice in Poland but it is common. To the extent that during my high school final exams in English (grades of which are kind of decisive to which university you might go), my English teacher was reading a newspaper in order not to see us cheating so that he did not have to report it. Or e.g. another teacher came up to my desk and gave me a piece of paper from another student sitting way in front of me in the row. I was supposed to write down the correct answers... It did change a bit while we were studying but still I remember that we sat in groups during written exams - having friends around you whom you could "discuss" the exam question with if no one was watching at the time.
I always heard stories that in the western Europe or US it would not have happened.
NL: I supervised students during one written exam this year and I have not caught anyone cheating. However, just a few minutes ago a colleague of mine came up to my office and showed me a paper of one of her students which he wrote on a subject that could have been covered also by the course I gave. After I checked some things it turned out he did not submit the same paper to two courses. Worse: he committed a fraud. See, after my course I posted online the best group paper. He used that one, changed it a bit and submitted it as his for this other course. Masters student. In law. Committing that kind of stupidity.
So yeah, I was wondering - what's your experience with this.
I always heard stories that in the western Europe or US it would not have happened.
NL: I supervised students during one written exam this year and I have not caught anyone cheating. However, just a few minutes ago a colleague of mine came up to my office and showed me a paper of one of her students which he wrote on a subject that could have been covered also by the course I gave. After I checked some things it turned out he did not submit the same paper to two courses. Worse: he committed a fraud. See, after my course I posted online the best group paper. He used that one, changed it a bit and submitted it as his for this other course. Masters student. In law. Committing that kind of stupidity.
So yeah, I was wondering - what's your experience with this.
- Serious Paul
- Devil
- Posts: 6644
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:38 pm
Up until High School, they were very strict on cheating. If you were caught, there some rather severe punishments, including in-school suspension. (Clarification: this was a private grade school)
Once in high school, it was more dependent on the teacher. Some would let you have those "discussion" groups for the exams but others were still strict on the no cheating policy. Overall, i would say that the great majority were against cheating or sharing of answers.
Once in high school, it was more dependent on the teacher. Some would let you have those "discussion" groups for the exams but others were still strict on the no cheating policy. Overall, i would say that the great majority were against cheating or sharing of answers.
I'd get expelled if I tried anything like that in my classes. Even when the class is a rehash of an old class - like say, Victorian Lit - I write up a whole new paper.
"There is surely nothing other than the single purpose of the present moment. A man's whole life is a succession of moment after moment. If one fully understands the present moment, there will be nothing else to do, and nothing left to pursue." - Yamamoto Tsunetomo
- Kitt
- Baron of the Imperium
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2002 5:42 pm
- Location: The state of insanity
In K-12, it depended on the teacher. Certainly, in high school, there was much more opportunity to cheat. The vast majority of teachers just cared about turning in grades, and most of them didn't care how the grades were achieved. While they couldn't just allow kids to use the book for "closed book" tests, but they often walked out of the room and told us to stay in our seats. Occasionally, they'd send another teacher in to "check up" on us. My personal favorite was when we were given a test by a completely clueless substitute. We convinced her that it was an open-book, group discussion test.
College, particularly State University of New York (SUNY) schools, have much stricter standards. Some have you submit papers electronically so they can send it to a website that automatically checks hundreds of databases to see if it's too similar to another paper/source/whatever. Consequences for being caught plagiarizing range from losing credit for the course (isolated incident with an otherwise "good" student) to permanent expulsion.
College, particularly State University of New York (SUNY) schools, have much stricter standards. Some have you submit papers electronically so they can send it to a website that automatically checks hundreds of databases to see if it's too similar to another paper/source/whatever. Consequences for being caught plagiarizing range from losing credit for the course (isolated incident with an otherwise "good" student) to permanent expulsion.
Real life quotes, courtesy of the PetsHotel:
"Drop it, you pervert!"
"Ma'am? Ma'am! You are very round."
"It's a hump-a-palooza today."
"Everybody get away from the poop bucket!"
"Drop it, you pervert!"
"Ma'am? Ma'am! You are very round."
"It's a hump-a-palooza today."
"Everybody get away from the poop bucket!"
One point I forgot to add. Those teachers that were more relaxed about cheating were also those that focused more on thinking versus memorization. One of my math instructors was like that. She allowed us to write down every formula we might possibly need and bring it to the test. Her reasoning? In practical life, you won't have to know the equations off the top of your head, you'll be able to look them up. She wanted to make sure we understand the process on how to use the equations.
-
- Demon
- Posts: 6550
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 5:39 pm
Cheating happens at all grade levels, but the farther up you go the worse the consquences are. Hell, if I cheated on an engineering exam and was caught, it would be an automatic FF, expelled from the college, and my academic career would basically be over at any accredited school.
I will say this though: just because you wrote a paper for one class doesn't make it cheating to submit it to another class, as long as the paper is all your own work (and as long as the teacher did not stipulate otherwise). You can't plagiarize yourself.
I will say this though: just because you wrote a paper for one class doesn't make it cheating to submit it to another class, as long as the paper is all your own work (and as long as the teacher did not stipulate otherwise). You can't plagiarize yourself.
When I was studying getting cought cheating (and there were cheaters...I've seen 'em do it)meant getting expelled for that specific subject and a black note in your file. Furthermore you would not be able to take any more exams in that semester.
I thought it only fair.
I thought it only fair.
It's lonely at the top. But it's comforting to look down upon everyone at the bottom.
Cheating is very frowned upon in Denmark, but apparently is a common practice in a lot of the eastern European countries. We had several students from Poland and Hungary get in trouble in my program because they didn't take the Danish rules about cheating, bibliographies, and citations seriously.
I haven't ever had an experience in the US or Denmark where cheating has been ok.
I haven't ever had an experience in the US or Denmark where cheating has been ok.
<center><font face="monospace" color=#0099FF font size="-1">one more blue sunny day</font></center>
- Adam
- Freeman of the Crimson Assfro
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 4:27 am
- Location: on.ca
- Contact:
<i>Plagiarize</i> means to pass off someone else's work and present it as your own. Therefore, you cannot plagiarize yourself, assuming that things are cited correctly.
However, if someone else -- such as a publisher -- owns your work, you can violate someone else's copyright, but you would still not be plagiarizing.
However, if someone else -- such as a publisher -- owns your work, you can violate someone else's copyright, but you would still not be plagiarizing.
-
- Demon
- Posts: 6550
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 5:39 pm
Both Adam and yourself are correct. Individual schools govern self-plagiarism differently (none of the ones I have gone to have regulated it at all), and copyright plays a large part in self-plagiarism with regard to actual publications (commercial or academic). However, none of the schools I've attended rule it plagiarism to submit the same paper to different classes. <shrug>Szechuan wrote:According to the definitions used at UNB, you absolutely can. Submitting the same paper for different classes, however relevant to both classes, is considered plagiarism.Ancient History wrote:You can't plagiarize yourself.
- Kwyndig
- Grand Marshall of the Imperium
- Posts: 3613
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2002 7:55 am
- Location: The Orbiting Volcano Lair, high above the surface of Bulldrek
- Contact:
Well then, I shall have to stay away from the UNB.Adam wrote: According to the definition of plagarism, the UNB's definition of plagarism rapes a kitten.
Personally, I hate cheating and plagarism, hell, I dislike my own research being cited by someone else (funny story there, a student at a school once cited as a factual source a short story I had written and put online, I can only hope he got an F), and when I bother to pursue education, I tend to do so at places that have vigorous (or at least supposedly vigorous) anti-cheating and plagarism policies.
kwyndig@yahoo.com This sig for rent, reasonable rates
I did some more research, and the only references to self-plagiarism I can find refer to using your own copyrighted or published work. Whether or not a student essay legally falls under that heading, I don't know.Adam wrote:According to the definition of plagarism, the UNB's definition of plagarism rapes a kitten.Szechuan wrote:According to the definitions used at UNB, you absolutely can.
- Adam
- Freeman of the Crimson Assfro
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 4:27 am
- Location: on.ca
- Contact:
I'm not saying that his school doesn't do that, but based on his explanation of it [which I'm sure is paraphrased], it basically means that anytime a student writes anything, they are, according to the school's rules, plagarising themselves. In Canada, and the USA, work you produce that can be covered by copyright is covered by copyright the moment it is expressed in a tangible form: written down, recorded on your iPod voice recorder, etc.
- Jeff Hauze
- Wuffle Trainer
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 10:31 pm
- Jestyr
- Footman of the Imperium
- Posts: 3036
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 8:10 am
- Location: BNE/.au
- Contact:
It's ridiculous to ban "self-plagiarism" anyway. If the paper meets the criteria for both assignments, it should be legitimately submittable for two assignments - it's foolish (and bad, educationally) to expect the student to make up brand-new opinions and arguments for the second essay just because he's not allowed to repeat the first paper.
In Australia, plagiarism is taken seriously at a tertiary education level. Minor incidences (inadequate referencing, very minor use of verbatim quotes without references, etc) will usually get your marks reduced. More serious plagiarism, and cheating in exams, will at _minimum_ get you a zero mark for the assessment item, usually get you failed for the entire unit, and sometimes suspended/excluded/expelled.
At a high school level, god knows. I doubt it would be expulsion; probably suspension and academic penalties.
In Australia, plagiarism is taken seriously at a tertiary education level. Minor incidences (inadequate referencing, very minor use of verbatim quotes without references, etc) will usually get your marks reduced. More serious plagiarism, and cheating in exams, will at _minimum_ get you a zero mark for the assessment item, usually get you failed for the entire unit, and sometimes suspended/excluded/expelled.
At a high school level, god knows. I doubt it would be expulsion; probably suspension and academic penalties.
__
Jeff Hauze: Wow. I think Jestyr just fucking kicked my ass.
Jeff Hauze: Wow. I think Jestyr just fucking kicked my ass.
- Jeff Hauze
- Wuffle Trainer
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 10:31 pm
Well where's the fun in that? I'm sorry, but you and your laws lose. I win.Adam wrote:No. You can't copyright short phrases -- you can't even trademark them, only a particular expression of them without a certain field. Sorry.
Screw liquid diamond. I want to be able to fling apartment building sized ingots of extracted metal into space.
- Jeff Hauze
- Wuffle Trainer
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 10:31 pm
Look, it's Canada's fault. I'm sorry, but you'll just have to accept that and learn to live with it. Even the guys from South Park know to Blame Canada. It hurts, White Jesus, I know that. But the truth does hurt.
Screw liquid diamond. I want to be able to fling apartment building sized ingots of extracted metal into space.
In the case I mentioned the student ended up submitting a paper of someone else from my course as his own for this other course. He changed the wording but the whole paper structure and ideas were not his. That is plagiarism alright.
I asked what kind of consequences he will be facing. He was invited for a conversation with the lecturer of this other course. Depending on him showing remorse or not - he will be either asked to submit another paper or will be informed that he is failing this course. To me it does not sound like a harsh punishment at all.
I asked what kind of consequences he will be facing. He was invited for a conversation with the lecturer of this other course. Depending on him showing remorse or not - he will be either asked to submit another paper or will be informed that he is failing this course. To me it does not sound like a harsh punishment at all.
The definition isn't from my school. Google "Self-Plagiarism".Adam wrote:I'm not saying that his school doesn't do that, but based on his explanation of it [which I'm sure is paraphrased], it basically means that anytime a student writes anything, they are, according to the school's rules, plagarising themselves. In Canada, and the USA, work you produce that can be covered by copyright is covered by copyright the moment it is expressed in a tangible form: written down, recorded on your iPod voice recorder, etc.
- Adam
- Freeman of the Crimson Assfro
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 4:27 am
- Location: on.ca
- Contact:
It seems that few really agree on what self-plagarism *is.*
I did a little bit of reading, and I like this article's take: http://www.ucalgary.ca/~hexham/study/plag.html -- it defines the problem as _misleading the reader_ as opposed to _re-using your own work_.
Jeff: I'm really sick of Canada/Canadian jokes directed at me, especially when they're completely irrelevant to the situation and not funny. So if you could desist, I'd appreciate that. If you'd like further explanation, I'll explain it to you over PM.
I did a little bit of reading, and I like this article's take: http://www.ucalgary.ca/~hexham/study/plag.html -- it defines the problem as _misleading the reader_ as opposed to _re-using your own work_.
Jeff: I'm really sick of Canada/Canadian jokes directed at me, especially when they're completely irrelevant to the situation and not funny. So if you could desist, I'd appreciate that. If you'd like further explanation, I'll explain it to you over PM.
- Jeff Hauze
- Wuffle Trainer
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 10:31 pm
Mostly just a product of being bored at work. We'll return you all to the pre-hijacked thread now.
As for the self-plagarism bit, write a new paper. New assignment, new paper. That's how it always got treated in my classes.
As for the self-plagarism bit, write a new paper. New assignment, new paper. That's how it always got treated in my classes.
Screw liquid diamond. I want to be able to fling apartment building sized ingots of extracted metal into space.
- Jestyr
- Footman of the Imperium
- Posts: 3036
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 8:10 am
- Location: BNE/.au
- Contact:
It still doesn't make sense, though.
If they up-front acknowledge "okay, we're making you write a new paper, because part of this course is learning how to formulate arguments on any position, not just argue your own point of view", then okay. Frustrating for the student, but it has some educational merit.
But if you're trying to pretend that the document is a real academic exercise, requiring the writer to write a brand new paper even if they're reiterating the same points seems like making the student jump through pointless hoops. If the point of the exercise is to assess how well the student understands a subject and can argue for a given point of view, it shouldn't matter whether the paper was written six months ago for an equivalent class, or last week for this class - it should be examined on its own merits. Just because another lecturer has seen it for another class doesn't automatically make it any less valid for this one.
If they up-front acknowledge "okay, we're making you write a new paper, because part of this course is learning how to formulate arguments on any position, not just argue your own point of view", then okay. Frustrating for the student, but it has some educational merit.
But if you're trying to pretend that the document is a real academic exercise, requiring the writer to write a brand new paper even if they're reiterating the same points seems like making the student jump through pointless hoops. If the point of the exercise is to assess how well the student understands a subject and can argue for a given point of view, it shouldn't matter whether the paper was written six months ago for an equivalent class, or last week for this class - it should be examined on its own merits. Just because another lecturer has seen it for another class doesn't automatically make it any less valid for this one.
__
Jeff Hauze: Wow. I think Jestyr just fucking kicked my ass.
Jeff Hauze: Wow. I think Jestyr just fucking kicked my ass.
- Jeff Hauze
- Wuffle Trainer
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 10:31 pm
That seems to be pretty much one of the primary goals of much of the U.S. education system.Jestyr wrote:But if you're trying to pretend that the document is a real academic exercise, requiring the writer to write a brand new paper even if they're reiterating the same points seems like making the student jump through pointless hoops.
Screw liquid diamond. I want to be able to fling apartment building sized ingots of extracted metal into space.
- Kwyndig
- Grand Marshall of the Imperium
- Posts: 3613
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2002 7:55 am
- Location: The Orbiting Volcano Lair, high above the surface of Bulldrek
- Contact:
Short version, my own research is not original, and I feel that people could better spend their time drawing their own conclusions from the same sources instead of copying my own faulty logic.
kwyndig@yahoo.com This sig for rent, reasonable rates
- Kwyndig
- Grand Marshall of the Imperium
- Posts: 3613
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2002 7:55 am
- Location: The Orbiting Volcano Lair, high above the surface of Bulldrek
- Contact:
Okay, perhaps I'm having a fundamental breakdown of language here, as does happen from time to time, let's just drop that part of my post and call me a crazy fool, okay?
kwyndig@yahoo.com This sig for rent, reasonable rates
- Serious Paul
- Devil
- Posts: 6644
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 12:38 pm
I cheated on my tests in physics repeatedly in high school. Physics was the only subject I never ever liked and did not comprehend it (except optics and astronomy within it maybe). I knew all the formulas but never knew when to use which one. So I got tips on that from guys sitting behind me or in front of me in a row. Result: finished high school with equivalent of B+ in physics and my teacher trying to convince me to take an oral test with her to upgrade my grade to A. I had a really terrified face when she suggested it.
I cheated some in jr high and high school. Mostly in copying someone else's homework because I was too lazy to do it myself. Sometimes on tests/quizes. Never on papers. Never plagerised. I have not cheated at all in college (that I recall). For the most part I didn't feel bad about it. I did feel bad about cheating on a quiz in one class and ended up telling the teacher and I took a zero. I guess I just felt guilty cause I liked the teacher in that particular instance. I don't remember if she actually gave me a zero or if she let me keep the grade I got because I was honest. Oh, man, the worst was Spanish. I would've never gotten through Spanish without some help.
<center><font face="monospace" color=#0099FF font size="-1">one more blue sunny day</font></center>
-
- Demon
- Posts: 6550
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 5:39 pm
I was taking a test in math once in high school, and completely blanked on the quadratic equation, which we'd just started studying. So I started from general principles and re-engineered the equation, and was able to provide the correct result. Personally, I think it's more important to be able to recreate - and thus understand - the basis for math than it is to simply look on the board, read off the equation, and plug the numbers in. That's arithmetic, and it's the least important part of mathematics. If you want something to remember the equation or compute the equation, buy a computer. What is important is understanding the equation.Ancient History wrote:I knew a lot of kids who smuggled formulae into exams...but then, I think if it is an exam, all the formulae should be provided.
- Jeff Hauze
- Wuffle Trainer
- Posts: 1415
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 10:31 pm
Dear God I wish math had been taught that way. I can't remember mathematical formulas from even alegbra with any regularity anymore.3278 wrote:I was taking a test in math once in high school, and completely blanked on the quadratic equation, which we'd just started studying. So I started from general principles and re-engineered the equation, and was able to provide the correct result. Personally, I think it's more important to be able to recreate - and thus understand - the basis for math than it is to simply look on the board, read off the equation, and plug the numbers in. That's arithmetic, and it's the least important part of mathematics. If you want something to remember the equation or compute the equation, buy a computer. What is important is understanding the equation.
Screw liquid diamond. I want to be able to fling apartment building sized ingots of extracted metal into space.
-
- Demon
- Posts: 6550
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 5:39 pm
Deriving formulae is fine when you're taking shit-for-grins physics or trig, but it's a touch of a pain in the ass when you're looking at a chapter on electronic materials with over a hundred formulae in it. I agree that understanding the principles and derivation behind a formula is important, and indeed correctly analyzing the problem is more important than the exact cookie-cutter method or formula you use to solve it, but beyond a certain basic point deriving your own formulae is impractical.
Neither can I, but because I understand them, I can figure them out when I need them. Not as fast as remembering, but remembering isn't something I do.Jeff Hauze wrote:Dear God I wish math had been taught that way. I can't remember mathematical formulas from even alegbra with any regularity anymore.
I think this approach should be much more common in school. I think it would result in more children who develop independent thought, inventiveness, and new ideas than the simple recitation which is so common today in the US. Germany had great success with this in their technical schools in the 19th century. One of their students invented artificial blue dye, and began the craze for anilines which culminated in your being able to buy whatever color shirt you desire.